The question this resource answers
Flag product-route words in a proposed query or article phrase before assigning it to a product page. It is written for editors reviewing saline search intent, with the focus kept on product scope map. The aim is a usable record or calculation rather than another generic product-ranking page.
Gather the inputs before interpreting the result
The worksheet asks for: Search phrase or proposed wording. Keep the relevant package, item reference or source document nearby when completing a field. If the source does not establish a fact, leave it unresolved rather than replacing it with a plausible assumption.
How the working is performed
Treat matched terms as editorial questions, not as approved indications. Separate generic packaging intent from route-specific language and ask for exact product evidence before writing a recommendation.
Work through a concrete case
A keyword containing an injection or eye-care term should not silently inherit a recommendation for a differently labeled item.
What the result cannot establish
Keyword research is not product-use evidence. This does not approve advertising or clinical copy. Review the original item and source before turning a worksheet result into a purchase statement. A calculation can be correct while an input is incomplete, outdated or attached to the wrong product.
Retain a reviewable record
Keep the date, item identity and the source behind any product-specific statement. If you share an output, retain its assumptions and limitations alongside it. Use the interactive tool to reproduce the working rather than presenting an unexplained number or verdict.